hardcorebodybuilding.net
May 24, 2012, 01:24:16 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Full body routines - Yay or Nay  (Read 215 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
BEEF
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 281



View Profile Email
« on: May 10, 2007, 12:24:05 PM »

As the thread title states really.

A lot of people swear by these full body routines and all that. Also a lot of people have been singing the praises of the HIT method of training. Now I'm sure they're not crap, but it can't be as effective as a decent split can it? I can't see how squatting 3 times a week but for 2 sets a time would stimulate anything? I at least like to feel like I've done a good workout and burned the muscle out well.

EDIT: OOPS! This is aimed at Bodybuilding, of course full body routines are useful for different aspects of the industry, such as DQ kindly pointed out to me in another thread, but this is just aimed at serious bodybuilders, are they any good?
Logged

BELIEVE
JohnnyCage
Queens Minion
Full Member
*****

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 203



View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: May 10, 2007, 09:26:22 PM »

Nay. I am a firm beleiver that it is better to train the body as a whole when you are aimed at doing better is sports and gaining strength, but I dont think it is that good for mass.
Logged

Yesterday I dared to struggle. Today I dare to win.
muscle_n_blood
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 325


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2007, 09:39:05 AM »

When I first started experimenting with training in the late 60's, a standard workout regimen was a full body workout 3 x a week. Low volume, usually one or two excercises per bodypart, 3 sets, 10 reps or so. Made gains on it, but I was a kid and would respond to anything then. As we got more advanced and added new excercises, we just started splitting up into 2 training sessions a day, still hitting bodyparts 3 x a week. Trained this way throughout the 70's, off and on. For this to work, ya gotta eat and ya gotta get plenty of rest, (I didn't, then) and I wouldn't train that way today.

Back then, not nearly as much emphasis was put on back and legs, which require the most output by far. We hammered arms and chest, but just did a few chins and rows for back, and a few sets of squats for legs. I was at my biggest, strongest in my early 30's, when we were hitting everything every 5-6 days or so. My physique was best about 10 yrs ago on the same type program, but added cardio and diet.

Logged

There is no substitute for experience.
RJSMuscle
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 92



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2007, 12:06:29 PM »

for the average Joe, full body is fine but if you want to really hit a muscle group hard you gotta split them up throughout the week.

I can't see how you could recover fully in just one day from a full body routine.....a recipe for over training for sure
Logged

p.s.
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +6/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 994



View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2007, 03:42:13 AM »

I've tried every concievable routine over the years including 3x per week and even HIT, and I've made my greatest gains training 1 major bodypart per day on a 5x per week schedule ie shoulders on monday, legs on tuesday, chest wednesday, back thursday, and arms friday using high volume (sets and reps).

No matter what you try though ya gotta eat and rest in order to grow, or you'll just be spinning your wheels.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!